Legislative efforts made in 2012, spearheaded
by CVLTF and supported by other veterans organizations, sought to address shortfalls
in Penal Code §1170.9, most notably the elements within the law which had been
inhibiting veterans from seeking treatment in lieu of custody. Many veterans who have been convicted of
criminal activity have never before been before a court. This is their first
offense and they have chosen a relatively light sentence over the more
challenging 12-18 month treatment regimens and monitoring. Because traditional
sentencing and sentencing under Penal Code §1170.9 both required convictions,
there was little incentive for a veteran to accept treatment. In fact, for most veterans, treatment was a
disincentive, not something they sought (and this is still generally true).
Compared to incarceration, treatment was a much longer and more arduous path
that included having to engage in therapy about issues that most veterans would
prefer to avoid. Without incentives,
most have been reluctant to admit they have a problem and choose treatment over
incarceration.
AB2371, the amendment to PC §1170.9, has
updated this remarkable law and given veteran offenders a new perspective and a
powerful incentive: Judges are now authorized to grant relief to veterans by
enabling those who have completed treatment regimens to return to their
communities and seek employment without the legal requirement to report the
arrest or criminal conviction which brought them to the veterans treatment
court. Veterans themselves can recognize that by including this provision in
the law, the state has attached a very special classification to veteran mental
health conditions. And for those still unwilling to acknowledge that their
actions are a result of their illness, veterans advocates have a powerful new tool
to persuade veterans to seek treatment; treatment which can cure their symptoms
and keep them from committing additional crimes.
As a result of other changes in this
amendment, judges may grant some very nontraditional relief if they find that the
veteran has met specific criteria and was successful, is law abiding and does
not represent a danger to self or others.
A formal motion must be brought wherein evidence is heard, any victim
has the right to appear and address the court, and the entire monitoring
history is reviewed. If the judge finds
that the veteran-offender has met the difficult criteria outlined in the
statute, an order to dismiss the case and seal the court and arrest records may
result. This allows a veteran who has
been successful in overcoming his mental health challenges to obtain
employment, seek jobs that otherwise would be denied him, and be returned to
their former law-abiding selves.
While data shows that judicial monitoring
under PC §1170.9 is consistently successful, the collateral consequences of a
criminal record are significant and contribute to unemployment, underemployment
and homelessness for these rehabilitated veterans. This population is
especially prone to the collateral consequences of criminal convictions due to
the fact their skills are typically tied to jobs in government, schools, and in
security.
Other than avoiding incarceration, which may
be very short term especially given the advent of AB109 Realignment
(restructuring of the California prison system), there had been no provision in
Penal Code §1170.9 that allowed a monitoring judge to legally recognize the
hard work and intense scrutiny an offender undergoes during the monitoring
program.
The restorative provisions of this amendment
to PC §1170.9 will prevent homelessness and create safer communities by
reducing crimes that would have likely been committed had these veterans not
received treatment for their traumatic conditions.
This relief specifically applies only to criminal
offenders where a judge fully considers all facts of the case from both
prosecution and defense, hears from any victims involved, and makes an informed
conscientious decision to put the offender on probation. It does not apply to anyone whom a judge
with that information does not see as worthy of probation, including those
considered dangerous to communities. If
the veteran returns to criminal activity, the prior offense can be included in
his record.
CVLTF provided public and legislator education,
VTRC data analysis, research and expert testimony in the drafting and review of
Assembly Bill 2371 in the California Legislature. CVLTF is proud to join other veterans and
public safety advocates in this legislative change to enable restorative relief
for California veterans.